United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2023

Sandoval Delgado v. Diaz Marquez

Sandoval Delgado v. Diaz Marquez
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided December 20, 2023
Sandoval Delgado v. Diaz Marquez

Trial Court Opinion

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION WILFRIDO SANDOVAL DELGADO, Case No. 23-cv-05141-VKD 9 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 10 v. EX PARTE MOTION IN LIMINE WITHOUT PREJUDUCE 11 VERANIA DIAZ MARQUEZ, Re: Dkt. No. 22 Respondent.

14 On December 20, 2023, petitioner Wilfrido Sandoval Delgado filed an “Ex Parte Motion in Limine” to exclude the testimony of an expert witness proffered by respondent Verania Diaz Marquez. Dkt. No. 22. The Court denies the ex parte motion without prejudice. If Mr. Sandoval objects to the proposed testimony of Ms. Diaz’s expert, he may raise those objections in accordance with the abbreviated pretrial preparation procedures outlined in the Court’s case management order. See Dkt. No. 20-1 at 4-5 (objections to witnesses).

20 If the parties feel that they are unable to obtain necessary discovery prior to the December 29, 2023 deadline, the Court encourages them to discuss whether a modification to the schedule should be made and to promptly advise the Court of their proposals. However, the Court reminds the parties that they should only seek discovery that is truly necessary to the presentation of their respective positions, given that the Hague Convention requires that these proceedings be conducted in an “expeditious” manner. See Norinder v. Fuentes, 657 F.3d 526, 533 (7th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he adjudication of a petition for return of a child is much like a district court's exercise of equitable power in the context of a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order. In the relevant facts, and a decision must be rendered on an expedited basis.”).!

2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 Dated: December 20, 2023 Vuisiuin®, QLeMarch VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI 6 United States Magistrate Judge a 12 it 18 27 ' For example, if Ms. Diaz’s proposed expert will not rely on any examination or interview of 2g || tespondent or her minor child, the Court questions whether Mr. Sandoval’s rebuttal expert requires any such examination or interview. See Dkt. No. 22 at 5 n.1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.