1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 AMY MCCORMACK et al. ) 11

) Case No.: 3:22-cv-00525-AJB-DDL ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) CLASS ACTION ) 13 v. ) Order Dismissing Entire Action ) 14 ) Without Prejudice Pursuant to STERLING JEWELERS, INC. et al. ) Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 15 ) 16 Defendants. ) ) ) 17 ) ) 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27 1 The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this action without prejudice. All 2 || parties have agreed to the dismissal. 3 In light of the stipulation, the case has been dismissed without prejudice pursuant 4|| to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); see also 5|| Ripley v. Bridgestone Retail Ops., LLC., No. C09-1482 RSM,

, at *2 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 2, 2010) (citing Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, § 23.64[2][a] (2007)); see also Richey vy. GetWellNetwork, Inc., No. 20-cv-2205-BEN-BLM, 2021 8 || WL 424281, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2021) (“Because no class has been certified in this 9 || case, Rule 23 does not mandate either court approval of the instant settlement or notice 10 || to putative class members” [quoting Allred v. Chicago Title Co., No. 19CV2129-LAB 11 || (AHG),

, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2020]). 12 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 13 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 3 Dated: February 14, 2023

7 United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 jp ——___ ee ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE