Martin v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Martin v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} RUTH MARTIN, Case No.: 23cv0441-L-WVG 12 Plants, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 |] Vv. DISMISS AS MOOT 14 |} NORDIC NATURALS, INC., [ECF No. 3] 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. (ECF 18 || No. 3.) Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (ECF no. 4). See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 19 || 15(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, motion to dismiss is denied as moot. See Ramirez v. County 20 || of San Bernardino,
806 F.3d 1002, 1008(9th Cir. 2015). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 || Dated: May 9, 2023 fee oop 5 H . James Lorenz, United States District Judge 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown