United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2023

Canales v. Guzman

Canales v. Guzman
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided June 13, 2023
Canales v. Guzman

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Case No.: 3:23-cv-1059-GPC-MSB ANGEL CHRISTOPHER CANALES, ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED GUZMAN, Warden, GOVERNMENT 15 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR CLAIMS OFFICIAL, MAIL ROOM FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED SERGEANT, IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT 17 Defendants. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 20 Angel Christopher Canales (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Centinela State Prison located in Imperial, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff, however, has not prepaid the $402 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), however, and has not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

25 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 26 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the Plaintiff is a prisoner, and even if he is granted leave to commence his suit IFP, he remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).

9 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $402 in filing and administrative fees required to commence this civil action, nor has he submitted a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051.

13 II. Conclusion and Order 14 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 15 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay the $402 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and 18 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $402 civil filing fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020). The additional $52 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. Id. |/remain dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. ||§ 1914(a)’s fee requirements and without further Order of the Court.

3 (3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with this Court’s ||approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma || Pauperis.”

6 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 ||Dated: June 13, 2023 (2. sale (0 8 Hon. Gonzalo P. Curtel 9 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.