1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ULICES RAMALES, ) Case No. CV 23-7312 FMO (Ex) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 CHRISSY TEIGEN, ) ) 14 Defendant. ) ) 15 ) 16 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 40, 17 Notice of Setlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed 18 without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than 45 days, 19 to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this 20 action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an 21 extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as 22 consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link 23 v. Wabash R.R. Co.,

,

(1962). 24 Dated this 14th day of August, 2024. 25 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 26 United States District Judge 27 28