UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-06072-SPG-E Date October 4, 2024 Ti Paul Martinka v. New ThaiTown USA, Inc. itle

a Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before October 18, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Plaintiffs obtained entry of default as to Defendant New ThaiTown USA, Inc., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff has not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-06072-SPG-E Date October 4, 2024 Title Paul Martinka v. New ThaiTown USA, Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

00 00

Initials of Preparer pg