1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL A.M. STREET, No. 2:23-cv-02747-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY SOLANO COUNTY, 15 Defendant. 16

17 By order filed April 26, 2024, plaintiff was directed to submit a motion to proceed IFP or 18 pay the required fees in thirty days. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has 19 not filed a motion to proceed IFP, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to 21 a United States District Judge. 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. 28 1 Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 2 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 3 | may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th 4 Cir. 1991). 5 | Dated: May 29, 2024

g ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 DBI6 10 | pp/Prisoner/Civil/R/stree.2747.fta 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28