(PC) McClain v. Scottini
(PC) McClain v. Scottini
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JASON MCCLAIN, No. 2:22-cv-1631 WBS CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 D. SCOTTINI, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 19 Local Rule 302. 20 On May 7, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25 F.2d 207, 208(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,
708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 27 reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 28 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 2 || (ECF No. 34) is denied. . 3 Dated: June 4, 2024 allem Hh ah be WILLIAM B. SHUBB 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 || mccl1631jo 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown