1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONY BLACKMAN, No. 2:24-cv-1149 DJC AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. HILL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 23, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 23 days. ECF No. 3. The Court observes that this procedure is sufficient to constitute 24 notice to the Plaintiff of the potential disqualification under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) as 25 required by Andrews v. King,

. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 26 the findings and recommendations. 27 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to 28 be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS 1 HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are adopted in full; 3 2. Within thirty days of the service of this order, Plaintiff shall pay the entire 4 | $405.00 in required fees or face dismissal of this case; and 5 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further 6 | pretrial proceedings. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 | Dated: _June 7, 2024 “Dane A Ch brett Hon. Daniel alabretta 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 | Blact149.800 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28