(PS) Claire v. County of Sutter

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROUBLE P. CLAIRE, an individual, No. 2:22-cv-00780-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER SARA M. HOLLIS, 15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Terminating Discovery Sanctions. (ECF No. 46.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On April 4, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 50.) The time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed any objections.

24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed April 11, 2024 (ECF No. 50), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Terminating Sanctions (ECF No. 46) is GRANTED; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter default judgment against Defendant Sara 6 Hollis in an amount to be determined by separate motion.

7 | Date: June 11, 2024 11 Troy L. Nuhley United States District Judge