(PC) Deegan v. Cueva

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SIDNEY ROSS DEEGAN, JR., No. 2:23-cv-1130 DJC CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants.

17 On February 9, 2024, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The third amended complaint was due May 31, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint.

20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// ///// || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th || Cir. 1991).

3 | Dated: June 14, 2024 Card ft L (g— 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8] 1 deeg1130.fta 1]