1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL KEITH WILSON, No. 2:23-cv-01358-DAD-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SISKIYOU COUNTY JAIL, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in an action brought under

. This 17 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to

(b)(1). 18 On April 24, 2024, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to

1915A. ECF No. 16. The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and granted 20 plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies.

The time 21 for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 22 responded to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is unable or unwilling to cure the 23 defects in the complaint. 24 Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice 25 for the reasons stated in the April 24, 2024 screening order. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 1 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 4 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 5 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 6 | appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan,

(9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 7 | v. Yist,

(9th Cir. 1991). 8 9 | Dated: June 14, 2024 on by bie, iz ho , Za l tin (LHEAM 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28