1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MANUEL CORDOVA, No. 2:22-cv-01296 TLN AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 D. HURTADO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 24, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) The time to 23 file objections has passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on May 24, 2024 (ECF No. 16), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference Claim against Defendants is 5 DISMISSED without leave to amend; 6 3. This action will proceed on Plaintiff's ADA claim against Defendants; and 7 4. This action is referred back to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings. 8 | Date: June 20, 2024 9 /) 10 “ \/ lu 11 ao WN \ Troy L. Nunley } 12 United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28