1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:24-cv-00641-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STARBUCKS COFFEE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 18 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On April 10, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 20 served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and 21 recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 5.) The time to file 22 objections has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 26 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on April 10, 2024 (ECF No. 5), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 7 Date: June 28, 2024

10 Troy L. Nunley) ll United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28