Rodriguez v. Universal Recovery Corporation
Rodriguez v. Universal Recovery Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARMEN RODRIGUEZ, No. 1:22-cv-01175-JLT-SKO
12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 UNIVERSAL RECOVERY CORPORATION, (Doc. 17) 15 16 Defendant. 17
18 19 On July 4, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 20 (Doc. 17). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose,
111 F.3d 688, 692(9th Cir. 1997), and has been 22 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: July 8, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26
27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown