(PS) Smith v. Daybreak Metro Inc.
(PS) Smith v. Daybreak Metro Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COURTNEY SMITH, No. 2:24-cv-0124-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DAYBREAK METRO INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff filed the above captioned civil action without counsel. This matter was referred 18 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On June 21, 2024, and July 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and 20 recommendations herein which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF Nos. 16, 18.) The time to file 22 objections has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
24 F.2d 207, 208(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,
708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 26 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on June 21, 2024, and July 16, 2024 3 (ECF Nos. 16, 18), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. The Court GRANT Defendants Daybreak Metro Inc. and James Glenn McNeil’s 5 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) without leave to amend; 6 3. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims against Patrick K. Willis Co. Inc., 7 Patrick K. Willis, and American Recovery Service Inc without leave to amend; 8 and 9 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 10 | Date: August 15, 2024 i / 12 “ \/ Lu 13 — ZN NZ Troy L. Nunley» } 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown