1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO BATTON, Case No. 1:23-cv- 1532 JLT CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 25(A)(1), AND 14 DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO D. DIMMER, et al. CLOSE THE CASE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 29) 16 17 Mario Batton sought to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights while 18 incarcerated at SATF Corcoran. (See Doc. 1.) After first reporting Plaintiff passed away in a 19 Joint Scheduling Report, counsel for Plaintiff filed a “Suggestion of Death Upon the Record” 20 pursuant to Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on February 16, 2024. (Doc. 16.) 21 Plaintiff’s counsel identified a potential successor-in-interest as Bridgette Givens, Plaintiff’s 22 spouse, and served her with the Notice and Suggestion of Death, Notice of Removal, the 23 operative pleadings in the case, and additional legal documents related to the pending action on 24 April 24, 2024. (Doc. 26.) 25 After neither Ms. Givens nor any other party filed a motion for substitution, the assigned 26 magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 27 Procedure 25(a)(1). (Doc. 29). The magistrate judge found that because a motion for substitution was not filed within the applicable 90-day period, Plaintiff’s claims must be dismissed. (Id. at 3.) 1 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on the parties and notified them that 2 | any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 29 at 4.) The Court advised all parties the “failure 3 | to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (/d., 4 | citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

(9th Cir. 2014).) No objections were filed. 5 According to

(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. 6 | Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 7 || are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 8 1. Findings and Recommendations dated July 29, 2024 (Doc. 29) are ADOPTED in full. 9 2. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1). 10 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 11 b IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 | Dated: _August 16, 2024 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28