1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BIANCA M. CURRY, No. 2:24-cv-1300-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SCOTT HEINE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and

(b)(1). 20 On July 17, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) The time to 23 file objections Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on July 17, 2024 (ECF No. 11), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 | Date: August 23, 2024 / “ / Vimy 9 — □□ x Z Troy L. Nunley } 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28