1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01157-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 Jim Cooper, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, filed the above captioned civil action. This matter 18 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local 19 Rule 302. 20 On July 25, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 60.) Plaintiff filed objections 23 to the findings and recommendations, which the Court considered. (ECF No. 62.) 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on July 25, 2024 (ECF No. 60), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL ; 4 2. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 39); 5 3. The Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) without leave 6 to amend; 7 4. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings (ECF No. 8 59) as moot; and 9 5. The Court of Clerk is directed to close this case. 10 | Date: August 23, 2024 i /) 12 “ \/ of 13 a ZA N\ Troy L. Nunley» } 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28