Smith v. Novoa
Smith v. Novoa
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CANDACE SMITH, No. 1:24-cv-00251-KES-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THIS 13 v. CASE 14 DANNETTE NOVOA, et al., (Doc. 5) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Candace Smith proceeds pro se in this civil action. The matter was referred to a 19 United States magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which was denied without 21 prejudice on March 4, 2024. Doc. 3. Plaintiff was ordered to submit a long form IFP application 22 or pay the applicable filing fee within 45 days.
Id. at 3. Plaintiff was warned that failure to 23 comply with the court’s order could result in dismissal of the action.
Id. at 4. Plaintiff failed to 24 submit a long form IFP application, pay the filing, or otherwise respond to the court’s March 4, 25 2024 order. 26 On May 1, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 27 recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the 28 filing fee pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1914or to file an in forma pauperis application pursuant to 28 1 | U.S.C. § 1915. Doc. 5. 2 The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and notified plaintiff that any 3 | objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days after service. Id. at 2. Plaintiff was advised 4 | that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on 5 | appeal.” Jd., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,
772 F.3d 834, 838-39(9th Cir. 2014). No objections 6 | have been filed, and the deadline to do so has expired. 7 In accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this court has conducted a de novo review of 8 | this case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the court finds the findings and 9 | recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 11 1. The findings and recommendations issued on May 1, 2024 (Doc. 5), are ADOPTED 12 IN FULL; 13 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing 14 fee pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1914or to file an in forma pauperis application pursuant to 15
28 U.S.C. § 1915; and 16 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 17 18 19 | IT IS SO ORDERED. _ 20 Dated: _ August 26, 2024 4h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown