(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00367-JLT-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 13 v. ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO VASQUEZ, et al., PROSECUTE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 173) 17 Larry William Cortinas seeks to hold defendants liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 The assigned magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute, addressing Plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address. (Doc. 173.) The magistrate judge advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of his rights on appeal.”

24 (Id. at 5-6, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 25 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) More than 14 days have passed, yet no objections have been filed.

27 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and | Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court | ORDERS: 3 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on August 9, 2024 (Doc. 173) are 4 ADOPTED in full.

5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to obey court 6 orders and failure to prosecute.

7 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and to close this 8 case.

10 IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 Dated: _ August 29, 2024 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE