1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES WUNDERLICH, No. 2:24-cv-1847 TLN CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ALLRED, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 22, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to submit a completed in forma pauperis 18 application within 30 days. Plaintiff was specifically informed that he had to include a certified 19 copy of his inmate trust account statement with his application and that the “certification” portion 20 of the application had be completed by correctional staff. Plaintiff was warned that failure to 21 submit a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis would result in dismissal. 22 Plaintiff submitted and in forma pauperis application on August 12, 2024, but did not 23 submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement and the “certification” portion is not 24 complete. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 26 prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 2 || with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 3 || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 4 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

5 || (9th Cir. 1991). 6 | Dated: August 29, 2024 / aie } Kt | / } a a 7 CAROLYNK. DELANEY 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 | wunaisa7.sifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28