1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN MICHAEL LONG, No. 2:24-cv-1932 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 19, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to submit a completed in forma pauperis 18 application including a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement within thirty days. 19 Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be 20 dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s 21 order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HHEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 23 court judge to this case; and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 | with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

4 | (9th Cir. 1991). 5 | Dated: August 29, 2024 Card ht fa he 6 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 long1932.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28