United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2024

(SS) Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security

(SS) Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided October 1, 2024
(SS) Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORALIA LOPEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00342-CDB (SS) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANT STIPULATED REQUEST TO 13 v. VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT SECURITY, 15 (Doc. 21) Defendant.

16 14-DAY DEADLINE.

17 Clerk of Court to randomly assign District Judge

20 Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to voluntary remand pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to entry of judgment, filed September 24, 2024. (Doc. 21).

22 Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation, pleadings, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 24 1. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign a district judge to this action 25 for the purposes of reviewing these findings and recommendations.

26 And IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED 27 1. The above-captioned matter be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for 1 2. Upon remand, the Appeals Council shall remand the case to an Administrative Law 2 Judge for a new decision in accordance with the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 21); and 3 3. The Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and 4 against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner, and terminate 5 all pending dates.

6 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days of | being served with these findings and recommendations, the parties may file written objections | with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings || and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified | time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th | Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

13 | IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 Dated: _ October 1, 2024 | ww RR 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.