1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FELICIA VASQUEZ, No. 2:23-cv-01514 KJM AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 YUET SIN LEE and YUET SUN LEE, 15 Defendants. 16 17 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(19). 18 On July 9, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 19 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 20 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 25. Neither party has 21 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 22 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 23

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 24 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 25 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 26 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 27 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 28 ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2024, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiffs motion for default judgment (ECF No. 20) is DENIED as to both Yuet Sin 4 | Lee and Yuet Sun Lee. 5 | DATED: October 4, 2024.

7 = | ¥ FU/ Fees STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28