Romero Romero v. Becerra
Romero Romero v. Becerra
Trial Court Opinion
1 MMaantto Ghaorn Rzaaljeuz,, PCuhbileifc ADtetofernnedye r 2 GENNA ELLIS BEIER (SBN #300505) 3 HAYLEY ELIZABETH UPSHAW (SBN #257935) San Francisco Public Defender’s Office 4 555 7th Street San Francisco, California 94103 5 Telephone: (415) 734-3002 6 [email protected] [email protected] 7 Pro Bono Attorneys for Petitioner 8
9
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11
12 Nectali ROMERO ROMERO VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. 13 Petitioner, PROC. 41(A)(1)(i) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 v. 15 Case No. 3:24-cv-04262-TSH Moises BECERRA, et. al., 16 Respondents. 17
18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Mr. Romero voluntarily dismisses the 2 instant petition following the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Doe v. Garland, No. 24-15361, --- F.4th 3 ---,
2024 WL 3561360(9th Cir. July 31, 2024), in which the Court held that the Eastern District 4 is the proper district in which to file a habeas petition for a noncitizen challenging his detention 5 by ICE at Golden State Annex. 6 7 Dated: August 13, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 8 s/ Genna Beier 9 Genna Beier 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the instant habeas petition is dismissed. SO 3 ORDERED. 4 5 Date: August 13, 2024 ___________________________ 6 Hon. Thomas S. Hixson 7 United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Reference
- Status
- Unknown