1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 DAMIAN A. CASTRO, individually and Case No. 3:24-cv-00932-AJB-MMP on behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 CLASS ACTION 13 Plaintiff, Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Class 14 Claims Without Prejudice and 15 vs. Individual Claims With Prejudice

16 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 3 and 17 DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 On September 9, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss Plaintiffs class 2 || claims without prejudice and Plaintiffs individual claims with prejudice. All parties 3 || have agreed to the dismissal. 4 In light of the stipulation, Plaintiffs class claims are dismissed without prejudice 5 || and Plaintiff's individual claims are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule 6 || of Civil Procedure 41. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); see also Ripley v. 7 || Bridgestone Retail Ops., LLC., No. C09-1482 RSM,

, at *2 (W.D. 8 || Wash. Sept. 2, 2010) (citing Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, § 23.64[2][a] (2007)); see 9 ||also Richey vy. GetWellNetwork, Inc., No. 20-cv-2205-BEN-BLM,

|} 424281, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2021) (“Because no class has been certified in this 11 || case, Rule 23 does not mandate either court approval of the instant settlement or 12 || notice to putative class members.”) (quoting Allred v. Chicago Title Co., 13 || No. 19CV2129-LAB (AHG),

, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2020)). 14 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 || Dated: October 3, 2024 | ZS : Le 18 Hon. Anthony J.Battaglia 19 United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -l- Case No. 3:24-cv-00932-AJB-MMP Order Niecmiccinge Plaintiffy<e Clace Claime Withoait Prenidice and Individual Claime