1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO SANCHEZ, No. 2:24-cv-1427 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER AND CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Defendant. 17 18 On September 26, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. In that 19 order, plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 20 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on October 28, 21 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 23 court judge to this case. 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 | with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th 4} Cir. 1991). 5 | Dated: 11/08/24 Card ht fa he 6 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 sanc1427.fta 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28