1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELIZABETH MARIE SHEALY, No. 2:24-cv-02310-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BUBAK, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Elizabeth Marie Shealy (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under

. The matter was referred to a United 19 States magistrate judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 09, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 keep the court apprised of her current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 27 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 28 ///// 1 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 2 | F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 3 | See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 4 | the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 5 | the magistrate judge’s analysis. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 8 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 || Date: November 8, 2024 11

13 14 TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28