(HC) Torres v. Espinoza
(HC) Torres v. Espinoza
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] COLEEN IVA-MARIE TORRES, No. 2:19-cv-00093-DC-CKD-P 12 Petitioner, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 JANEL ESPINOZA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through appointed counsel with a petition for a 18 || writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 10, 2023, this court granted 19 || petitioner’s motion for a stay and abeyance pursuant to Rhines v. Weber,
544 U.S. 269(2005), to 20 || exhaust state court remedies. ECF No. 42. In light of the length of time that this case has been 21 || stayed, counsel for petitioner is directed to file a status report within 30 days advising the court of 22 || what steps have been taken to exhaust petitioner’s state court remedies and whether there are any 23 || pending state court proceedings. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for petitioner shall file a status 25 || report within 30 days from the date of this order describing what state remedies have been 26 || pursued and whether any remain pending. 27 || Dated: November 13, 2024 / Dis 3g 12/torr0093.status ANI fle A - * ] CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown