(PC) Allen v. Her

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROY C. ALLEN, No. 2:24-cv-1643 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. HER, et al., ORDER AND 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 On September 3, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. In that order, plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on November 1, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case.

23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th || Cir. 1991).

4 || Dated: November 15, 2024 Card it | [. la (g— 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY?

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE | altet643.fta 1]