(HC) Ezykel v. Castellanos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AUDINETTE EZYKEL, Case No. 1:24-cv-01395-EPG-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE 13 v. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASTELLANOS, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner Audinette Ezykel is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

19 When a state prisoner files a habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging convictions or sentences are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 27 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Section 2241 further states that, rather than dismissing an improperly | transfer” the habeas petition to another federal district for hearing and determination. Id.; see also | 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court may transfer any civil action “to any other district or division where it | might have been brought” for convenience of parties or “in the interest of justice”).

4 Here, Petitioner’s claims appear to relate to conditions of confinement and thus, the | petition should be heard in the district of confinement. Petitioner is currently confined at the | California Health Care Facility, which is located in Stockton, California, and is part of the | Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

8 | Therefore, venue is proper in the Sacramento Division. Local Rule 120(d).

9 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper | court may, on the Court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action | will be transferred to the Sacramento Division.

12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern | District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 15 2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall | be filed at: 17 United States District Court Eastern District of California 18 501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200 19 Sacramento, CA 95814 | IT IS SO ORDERED. | Dated: _November 15, 2024 [Je hey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE