(SS) Thao v. Commissioner of Social Security
(SS) Thao v. Commissioner of Social Security
Trial Court Opinion
1 Melissa Newel (CA SB# 148563) NEWEL LAW 2 2625 Alcatraz Ave., Suite 132 Berkeley, CA 94705 3 (510) 316-3827 4 [email protected]
5 Attorney for Plaintiff POR THAO 6
7 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 8 MATHEW W. PILE (WS SB# 32245) Associate General Counsel 9 Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Social Security Administration 10 JUSTIN L. MARTIN (MO SB# 62255) 11 Special Assistant United States Attorney 6401 Security Boulevard 12 Baltimore, MD 21235 (206) 615-3735 13 [email protected]
14 Attorneys for Defendant 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 POR THAO, No. 1:24-cv-00968 (SKO) 20 Plaintiff,
21 v. ORDER RE STIPULATION AND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AWARD 22 COMMISSIONER OF AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES SOCIAL SECURITY, PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO 23 JUSTICE ACT (
28 U.S.C. §2412(d)) Defendant. 24 (Doc. 15) 25 26 27 28 1 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned 3 attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Por Thao (“Plaintiff”) be awarded attorney 4 fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),
28 U.S.C. §2412(d), in the amount of six 5 hundred and eleven dollars and fifty-five cents ($611.55). This represents compensation for legal 6 services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in 7 accordance with
28 U.S.C. §2412(d). 8 After the Court issues an Order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider 9 the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. 10 Ratliff,
560 U.S. 586, 598(2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the 11 attorney fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the 12 Treasury’s Offset Program. After the Order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will 13 determine whether they are subject to any offset. 14 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines 15 that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt subject to offset, then the government shall cause the 16 payment of fees approved to be made payable to Melissa Newel or Newel Law (collectively 17 “Plaintiff’s counsel”), pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any and all payments 18 made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel, by check or by electronic transfer. 19 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA 20 attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under 21 EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any 22 and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees 23 and expenses in connection with this action. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 /// 2 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security 3 Act attorney fees under
42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the provisions of the EAJA.
4 Respectfully submitted, 5 Dated: November 22, 2024 NEWEL LAW 6
7 By: Melissa Newel 8 Melissa Newel Attorney for Plaintiff 9 POR THAO
10
11 Dated: November 22, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 12 MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel 13 Social Security Administration
14 By: Justin L. Martin* 15 JUSTIN L. MARTIN (*Authorized by email dated 11/22/2024) 16 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 17
18
19 ORDER
20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 21 §2412(d), attorney fees in the amount of six hundred and eleven dollars and fifty-five cents 22 ($611.55) be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation and Unopposed Motion (Doc. 15). 23
24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25
26 Dated: November 25, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27
28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown