(PC) Long v. World

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

(PC) Long v. World

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN MICHAEL LONG, No. 2:23-cv-1739-KJM-SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 WORLD, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. By order filed October 4, 2024, the court 18 revoked plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and ordered plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee 19 within 30 days. The time granted has expired and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise 20 communicated with the court. Because plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee as ordered by the 21 court, this action should be dismissed without prejudice. 22 For the reasons set forth above, it is RECOMMENDED as follows: 23 1. This action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. 24 2. The Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(l). Within 21 days after 27 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 28 the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 1 | Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 | objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 | Martinez v. Yist,

951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: November 22, 2024 5

7 SEAN C. RIORDAN 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown