1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EZRA O. ADAMS, Case No. 24-cv-06289-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v. 10 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., ll Defendants. 12 On October 15, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's civil rights complaint for failure to 5 13 present a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff was granted until November 13, 14 2024, to file an amended complaint, and warned that if he did not do so the case would be 3 15 dismissed. He has not filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, or shown a 16 || cause why not.! This case is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. 3 17 Miller,

, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to 18 amend and plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is necessary). 19 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: December 2, 2024 22 fo } 23 Hike

25 26 27 28 ' Plaintiff has filed several other new cases that will be addressed in separate orders.