1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICK J. BOOTH, No. 2:23-cv-0509 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 DAWN SANTOS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendant. 16 17 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the Postal 18 Service. It appears plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a 19 party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to 23 keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 110. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1] || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

2 | (9th Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: December 3, 2024 Card Kt | / ye □□□ 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 boot0509.133a

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28