Jeremy James Godwin v. Jody Miller
Jeremy James Godwin v. Jody Miller
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY JAMES GODWIN, Case No.: 24-cv-02267-CAB-VET CDCR #AS-4717, 12 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 13 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE 14 REQUIRED BY
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) JODY MILLER, Assistant District 15 AND/OR FAILING TO MOVE TO Attorney, County of Imperial, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 16 Defendant. PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 17 18 Plaintiff Jeremy James Godwin, proceeding without counsel and incarcerated at 19 Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, filed this civil 20 rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983in the Central District of California on 21 November 21, 2024. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) Because Plaintiff seeks to sue an Imperial 22 County Assistant District Attorney for alleged violations of his constitutional rights during 23 an Imperial County Superior Court proceeding, United States Magistrate Judge John D. 24 Early transferred the action to this Court for lack of proper venue and in the interests of 25 justice pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). (See ECF No. 4.) 26 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or to File In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) Motion 27 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 28 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 1 $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55, 2 although the $55 administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. 3 See
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee 4 Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023)). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 5 pay the entire fee only if he seeks and the court grants him leave to proceed IFP pursuant 6 to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes,
493 F.3d 1047, 1051(9th Cir. 2007); 7 Hymas v. U.S. Dep’t of the Interior,
73 F.4th 763, 765(9th Cir. 2023) (“[W]here [an] IFP 8 application is denied altogether, Plaintiff’s case [cannot] proceed unless and until the fee[s] 9 [a]re paid.”). 10 “While the previous version of the IFP statute granted courts the authority to waive 11 fees for any person ‘unable to pay[,]’ … the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act] 12 amended the IFP statute to include a carve-out for prisoners: under the current version of 13 the IFP statute, ‘if a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the 14 prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.’” Hymas,
73 F.4th at 76715 (quoting
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)). Section 1915(b) “provides a structured timeline for 16 collecting this fee.”
Id.(citing
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)-(2)). 17 Therefore, to proceed IFP, prisoners must “submit[] an affidavit that includes a 18 statement of all assets [they] possess[,]” as well as “a “certified copy of the[ir] trust fund 19 account statement (or institutional equivalent) for … the 6-month period immediately 20 preceding the filing of the complaint.”
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2). Using this financial 21 information, the court “shall assess and when funds exist, collect, … an initial partial filing 22 fee,” which is “calculated based on ‘the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account’ 23 or ‘the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account’ over a 6-month term; the 24 remainder of the fee is to be paid in ‘monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding 25 month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account.” Hymas,
73 F.4th at 767(quoting 28
26 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)–(2)); Williams v. Paramo,
775 F.3d 1182, 1185(9th Cir. 2015). 27 /// 28 /// 1 As Judge Early noted in his December 4, 2024 Order, Plaintiff did not paid the $405 2 filing pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time he filed suit in the Central District, nor 3 has he filed a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 4 in either the Central District or in this Court since the case was transferred. (See ECF No. 5 4 at 1, 3.) Until Plaintiff either pays the filing fee in full or complies with § 1915(a)’s 6 requirements, his case cannot proceed. See Andrews,
493 F.3d 1047, 1051; Hymas, 73 7 F.4th at 765. 8 II. Conclusion 9 Accordingly, the Court: 10 1) DISMISSES this civil action sua sponte without prejudice based on 11 Plaintiff’s failure to pay the $405 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion 12 to Proceed IFP pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a); and 13 2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed 14 to re-open the case by: (a) paying the entire $405 filing fee in full; or (b) completing and 15 filing a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his prison trust account 16 statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 17 § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR3.2.b;1 and 18 /// 19
20 21 1 Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to re-open this case by either paying the full $405 civil filing fee, or submitting a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP, his Complaint 22 will be subject to a preliminary screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and/or 28
23 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) regardless of whether he pays the fee in full, or is granted leave to proceed IFP and is obligated to pay it in installments. See Lopez v. Smith,
203 F.3d 1122, 24 1126‒27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but 25 requires” the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see 26 also Rhodes v. Robinson,
621 F.3d 1002, 1004(9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening 27 required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”). 28 1 3) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to provide Plaintiff with this Court’s 2 ||approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed Jn Forma 3 || Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $405 civil filing fee in full or complete and 4 ||submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, his case will remain dismissed 5 || without prejudice based on his failure to satisfy
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee requirements. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 || Dated: December 17, 2024 © Z 8 Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo ? United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4
Reference
- Status
- Unknown