1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BROUNCHE S. GREEN, No. 2:24-cv-1475 TLN SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 R. HILL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, originally filed this civil rights action in state 18 court. Defendants removed the case to federal court. (See ECF No. 1.) On screening the 19 complaint, this court found plaintiff failed to state any claims for relief cognizable under 42

. (Sept. 23, 2024 Order; ECF No. 9.) This court dismissed the complaint with leave 21 to file an amended complaint within sixty days. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file a 22 timely amended complaint, this court might recommend this action be dismissed. 23 Sixty days have passed and plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise 24 respond to the court’s September 23, 2024 Order. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 26 prejudice for failure to state a claim, for reasons explained in the Sept. 23, 2024 Order, for failure 27 to prosecute, and for failure to comply with court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R. 28 110. ] These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 2 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(1). Within twenty-one days 3 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, either party may file written 4 || objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's 5 || Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the 6 || specified time may result in waiver of the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. 7 || Yist,

(9th Cir. 1991). 8 || DATED: December 19, 2024 mk 10 SEAN C. RIORDAN 11 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28