1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM JOSEPH BABBITT, Case No. 2:24-cv-2397-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT 15 SERVICES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On October 30, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 19 recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice 20 that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 21 fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 States,

(9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 24 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) 25 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 26 district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 28 1 | analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October 30, 2024 are 4 | ADOPTED; 5 2. Plaintiff's amended complaint, ECF No. 4, is DISMISSED without leave to 6 | amend; 7 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 | Dated: _December 27, 2024 “Daniel A CoD tto— Hon. Daniel alabretta " UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28