Diamond PEO, LLC v. Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Diamond PEO, LLC v. Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 D INIA C.M ; aO nN d D SK P YE O H, I L GL HC P; EV OL , B LE LS CT , PEO,

C ase No. 08:21-CV-00866-SPG (KESx) 12 ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiffs, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 13

v.

14 CLEAR SPRING PROPERTY AND 15 CASUALTY COMPANY; and DOES 1

through 50, inclusive, 16

Defendants. 17

18 19 On November 16, 2023, Plaintiffs Diamond PEO, LLC, VL Best PEO, Inc. and 20 Sky High PEO, LLC and Defendant Clear Spring Property and Casualty Company (the 21 “Parties”) filed a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules 22 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(2) as the Parties have settled the action. The Parties 23 requested that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement pursuant to Kokkonen 24 v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America,

511 U.S. 375, 381-82

(1994). 25 The Court, having considered the Parties’ Stipulation, and finding good cause 26 therefor, hereby approves the Parties’ Stipulation and ORDERS the entire action between 27 the Parties dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 28 1 The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement pursuant to 2 || Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America,

511 U.S. 375, 381-82

(1994). 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. — > || Dated: January 18, 2024

6 HON. SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown