Marquise Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc.

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Marquise Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-10844-SPG-MAA Date April 16, 2024 Title Marquise Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc. et al

ee Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before April 30, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff's response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendants listed below have not answered the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. e Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc. e Ivan Geovanny Loor

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 23-10844-SPG-MAA Date April 16, 2024

Title Marquise Bailey v. Gold Coast Tire Co., Inc. et al

:

Initials of Preparer pg

Reference

Status
Unknown