1 2 3 4 5 6 JS-6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIANNE SULLIVAN, on behalf of herself ) Case No. CV 23-10691 FMO (JPRx) 12 and all others similarly situated, ) ) 13 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 14 v. ) ) 15 JARED’S LEADS, INC., ) ) 16 Defendant. ) ) 17 ) 18 The complaint in the above-captioned case contains individual and class allegations, but 19 no answer has been filed and no action has been taken in this matter. (See, generally, Dkt.). 20 Now, the court is informed that the parties have settled and that plaintiff will dismiss the action as 21 to her individual claim with prejudice. (See Dkt. 22, Notice of Settlement). 22 Having reviewed the case file and determined that no prejudice to the class will result from 23 the dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without 24 prejudice as to the class claims and with prejudice as to the individual claim. The dismissal shall 25 be without costs and plaintiff shall retain the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days from 26 the filing date of this Order, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court 27 retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. 28 Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth 1 above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice as 2 to the class claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co.,

, 3

(1962). 4 Dated this 30th day of April, 2024. 5 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28