Theresa Brooke v. Hasmukhlal G. Patel
Theresa Brooke v. Hasmukhlal G. Patel
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Case No. CV 24-00916-SPG-JDE Date May 22, 2024 Title Theresa Brooke v. Hasmukhlal G. Patel
a Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present
Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,
370 U.S. 626(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, on or before June 5, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Plaintiff obtained entry of default as to Defendant Hasmukhlal G. Patel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiffs have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiffs can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. 00 00
Initials of Preparer pg
Reference
- Status
- Unknown