Kaur v. Jaddou

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Kaur v. Jaddou

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GURPREET KAUR, Case No. 1:23-cv-00852-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 13 TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY 14 DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) UR JADDOU, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL 15 PROCEDURE Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 10)

17 18 On January 5, 2024, Plaintiff Gurpreet Kaur filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the 19 entire action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a). Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of 20 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his 21 action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” 22 Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc.,

193 F.3d 1074, 1077

(9th Cir. 1999) 23 (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997)). 24 In light of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose,

111 F.3d at 692

, and has been dismissed without 26 prejudice. 27 /// 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to adjust the docket to reflect 2 | voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 5 |Dated: _ January 8, 2024 "

‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown