United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2024

American Zurich Insurance Company v. ESG Republic, Inc.

American Zurich Insurance Company v. ESG Republic, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 17, 2024
American Zurich Insurance Company v. ESG Republic, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALORNIA AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-00643-NODJ-CDB COMPANY, 12 ORDER ON STIPULATION GRANTING Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE SECOND 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT v. 14 (Doc. 32) ESG REPUBLIC, INC., ESG REPUBLIC II, LLC, WORKLOGIC HR INSURANCE JANUARY 22, 2024, DEADLINE SERVICES LLC, BRADLEY C. BURKS, JEFFREY D. THORN, VENSURE HR, INC. and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on April 27, 2023. (Doc. 1).

On June 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed the now-operative first amended complaint. (Doc. 11).

Pursuant to the scheduling order entered in this action, any motions to amend the pleadings were to be filed by January 13, 2024. (Doc. 21 at 3). The scheduling order further provides: All proposed amendments must (A) be supported by good cause 25 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. Mammoth 26 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1) 27 prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, || Id. 2 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated request to permit Plaintiff to file a ||second amended complaint. (Doc. 32). Although the filing was made several days after the || deadline to request leave to file an amended pleading, the Court had considered the Foman || factors set forth above and finds good cause to grant Plaintiff leave to file a second amended || complaint.

7 For the foregoing reasons, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 8 1. No later than January 22, 2024, Plaintiff SHALL FILE as a stand-alone docket 9 entry the second amended complaint attached as Exhibit A to the parties’ 10 stipulation (Doc. 32 pp. 5-15); and 11 2. Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiff's second amended complaint shall be 12 governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). | Is SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ January 17, 2024 | hr 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.