The Burlington Insurance Company v. Ordas

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

The Burlington Insurance Company v. Ordas

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE Case No. 1:22-CV-01598-NODJ-SAB COMPANY, 10 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT Plaintiff, TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY V. DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE □□ □□□ 12 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL 13. | OSEAS ORDAS, PROCEDURE

4 Defendant. (ECF No. 16)

15 16 On January 25, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action without prejudice and 17 || with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 16.) In light of the stipulation of the 18 || parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 19 | Jose,

111 F.3d 688, 692

(9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice and without an 20 || award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 || case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 5 | Dated: _ January 26, 2024 □ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown