1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GERI LEPELTAK, No. 2:20-cv-01503 CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Based on

(b), counsel for plaintiff in the above-entitled action seeks an 19 award of attorney fees in the amount of $23,000.00 for 15.95 hours of professional time devoted 20 to the representation of plaintiff before this court. ECF No. 28. Counsel concedes that this 21 amount should be offset by $3,100.00 in fees previously awarded under EAJA. See ECF No. 27. 22 Defendant has filed a response and does not oppose the amount requested. ECF No. 29. 23

(b)(1)(A) provides, in relevant part: 24 Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, 25 the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of 26 the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment. 27 28 Rather than being paid by the government, fees under the Social Security Act are awarded out of 1 || the claimant’s disability benefits. Russell v. Sullivan,

(9th Cir. 1991), 2 || receded from on other grounds, Sorenson v. Mink,

(9th Cir. 2001). 3 || However, the 25 percent statutory maximum fee is not an automatic entitlement; the court also 4 || must ensure that the requested fee is reasonable. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,

, 808-09 5 || (2002) (“We hold that § 406(b) does not displace contingent-fee agreements within the statutory 6 || ceiling; instead, § 406(b) instructs courts to review for reasonableness fees yielded by those 7 || agreements.”). “Within the 25 percent boundary ... the attorney for the successful claimant must 8 | show that the fee sought is reasonable for the services rendered.” Id. at 807. 9 Counsel seeks fees for 15.95 hours of representation in the instant action, which resulted 10 || in ajudgment for plaintiff and a remand for further proceedings. See ECF NO. 24. The Court has 11 || considered the character of counsel’s representation and the good results achieved by counsel, 12 | which included an award of $143,681.00 in retroactive benefits. See ECF Nos. 28 at 16, § 4 13 || (Holmberg Decl.) & 28-3 (Nov. 8, 2023 Notice of Benefits). Counsel submitted a detailed billing 14 || statement that supports his request. ECF No. 28-4. There is no indication that a reduction of the 15 || award is warranted due to any substandard performance by plaintiff's counsel, as counsel secured 16 || asuccessful result. There is also no evidence that plaintiff's counsel engaged in any dilatory 17 || conduct resulting in delay. 18 Based on the quality of counsel’s representation and the results achieved in this case, the 19 || undersigned finds the number of hours expended to be reasonable. Accordingly, the undersigned 20 | will award the amount of attorney fees requested. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Plaintiff's counsel’s motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 28) is granted; and 23 2. Plaintiffs counsel is awarded $23,000.00 in attorney fees pursuant to

406(b). Upon payment of the fees sought herein, counsel shall refund plaintiff the 25 amount of $3,100.00 previously awarded under EAJA. 26 | Dated: January 30, 2024 / □□□ / 4 [iy ai 7 CAROLYNK. DELANEY 28 | 2/epel1503.fee-406(a) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE