Barca v. 90 Day Credit Experts, LLC
Barca v. 90 Day Credit Experts, LLC
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TONI BARCA, No. 2:23-cv-1028 DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 90 DAY CREDIT EXPERTS, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 18 READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES WHICH 19 THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND 20 PARTIES MUST COMPLY. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS 21 ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER 22 SANCTIONS WITHIN THE POWER OF THE COURT, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN 23 ORDER OF JUDGMENT. 24 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a United 25 States Magistrate Judge. See U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter has been reassigned to 26 the undersigned for all purposes. (ECF No. 12.) A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set 27 for February 2, 2024. Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court 28 has reviewed the parties’ joint status report (ECF No. 21) and has determined that the court need 1 not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling 2 conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). 3 Accordingly, the court vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for February 2, 4 2024, and hereby issues this scheduling order. 5 SERVICE OF PROCESS 6 Service of process has been completed. No further service is permitted except with leave 7 of court, good cause having been shown. 8 JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS 9 No further joinder of parties or amendment to pleadings is permitted except with leave of 10 court, good cause having been shown. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.,
975 F.2d 604, 11 609-10 (9th Cir. 1992). 12 JURISDICTION/VENUE 13 Jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims is predicated upon 28 U.S.C.§1331, is not disputed, 14 and is hereby found to be proper. Venue is not disputed and is also found to be proper. 15 DISCOVERY 16 The parties shall make initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 no 17 later than 28 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff shall disclose experts no later than August 18 9, 2024. Defendant shall disclose experts no later than August 23, 2024. Rebuttal experts shall 19 be disclosed no later than September 6, 2024. All discovery is left open, save and except that it 20 shall be so conducted as to be completed by October 4, 2024. The word “completed” means that 21 all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes 22 relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where 23 discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with. 24 MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 25 All law and motion, except as to discovery is left open, save and except that it shall be 26 conducted so as to be completed by November 22, 2024. The word “completed” in this context 27 means that all law and motion matters must be heard by the above date. The parties are cautioned 28 to refer to the local rules regarding the requirements for noticing such motions on the court’s 1 regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. This paragraph does not preclude motions for 2 continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, and is subject to any 3 special scheduling set forth in the “MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS” paragraph below. 4 The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and 5 refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are 6 susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify 7 and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in light of the 8 evidence gleaned through discovery. If it appears after examining the legal issues and facts that 9 an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, the parties are to file the appropriate motion by the 10 law and motion cutoff set forth supra. 11 ALL PURELY LEGAL ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY TIMELY PRETRIAL 12 MOTION. The parties are reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to 13 address the admissibility of evidence. THE PARTIES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE COURT 14 WILL LOOK WITH DISFAVOR UPON SUBSTANTIVE MOTIONS PRESENTED IN THE 15 GUISE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL. 16 FURTHER SCHEDULING 17 Within 30 days of receiving the court’s ruling on all remaining dispositive motions the 18 parties shall file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness. If no dispositive motions are filed, the parties 19 shall file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness within thirty days of the close of the law and motion 20 deadline. The parties’ Joint Notice of Trial Readiness shall address whether this case is related to 21 any other case on file in the Eastern District, likelihood of settlement, estimated trial length, a 22 request for either a bench or jury trial, and the parties’ availability for trial. Thereafter, the court 23 will set dates for a Final Pretrial Conference and trial. 24 The parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no 25 matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. The 26 parties are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the contents of and time for filing 27 Pretrial Statements. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES 281 AND 282 WILL 28 BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS. 1 Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 281, which contemplates the filing of 2 separate Pretrial Statements by plaintiff and defendant, the parties are to prepare a JOINT 3 STATEMENT with respect to the undisputed facts and disputed factual issues of the case. The 4 undisputed facts and disputed factual issues are to be set forth in two separate sections. The 5 parties should identify those facts which are relevant to each separate cause of action. In this 6 regard, the parties are to number each individual fact or factual issue. Where the parties are 7 unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before the court for trial, they should 8 nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES” all issues asserted by any of 9 the parties and explain by parenthetical the controversy concerning each issue. The parties should 10 keep in mind that, in general, each fact should relate or correspond to an element of the relevant 11 cause of action. 12 The parties should also keep in mind that the purpose of listing the disputed factual issues 13 is to apprise the court and all parties about the precise issues that will be litigated at trial. The 14 court is not interested in a listing of all evidentiary facts underlying the issues that are in dispute. 15 However, with respect to the listing of undisputed facts, the court will accept agreements as to 16 evidentiary facts. If the case is tried to a jury, the undisputed facts will be read to the jury. The 17 parties’ joint statement shall also address the parties’ position on the number of jurors to be 18 impaneled to try the case. 19 The joint statement of undisputed facts and disputed factual issues is to be filed with the 20 court concurrently with the filing of plaintiffs’ Pretrial Statement. Concurrently with the filing of 21 the joint statement, the parties shall submit a copy as a word document, in its entirety (including 22 the witness and exhibit lists discussed below) to: [email protected]. 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(10) and (11), the parties are required to provide in their 24 Pretrial Statements a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter 25 for what purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the Pretrial Statement itself, but shall be 26 attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final Pretrial Order. Plaintiff’s 27 exhibits shall be listed numerically; defendant’s exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. In the 28 event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the 1 amount of defendants’ exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be then listed as AAA, BBB, CCC, 2 etc. Each page within a multi-page exhibit shall be numbered. (For example, Exhibit A-1, A-2, 3 A-3). 4 In the event that plaintiff and defendant offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit 5 shall be referred to by the designation the exhibit was first identified by the moving party. The 6 court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that all concerned, including the jury, 7 will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a number and a letter. 8 The Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and 9 exhibits at trial not listed in the Pretrial Order. Counsel are cautioned that the standard will be 10 strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses which counsel do not 11 intend to call or use will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes. 12 The parties are also reminded that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, it will be their duty at 13 the Pretrial Conference to aid the court in (a) formulation and simplification of issues and the 14 elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts which should be properly 15 admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must 16 prepare their Pretrial Statements, and participate in good faith at the Pretrial Conference, with 17 these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF 18 SANCTIONS which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, eliminations of 19 claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the court deems appropriate. 20 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 21 The parties are advised that a Settlement Conference may be scheduled when the Final 22 Pretrial Conference is held.1 The court may require that all parties proceeding pro se be present 23 at the Settlement Conference. Such a settlement conference may be set before the undersigned, if 24 both parties request that the undersigned participate in the conference and will waive any claim of 25
1 At any time prior to the Final Pretrial Conference, an early settlement conference may be set 26 before the undersigned, or another magistrate judge who is randomly selected, if all parties agree 27 to request an early settlement conference. Either party may initiate such a request by calling Shelly Her, courtroom deputy to the undersigned, at (916) 930-4128. Information will be 28 provided regarding the procedure to follow. 1 disqualification on that basis. The parties may also request a settlement conference before 2 another magistrate judge. See Local Rule 270(b). 3 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 4 There appear to be no other matters presently pending before the court that will aid the 5 just and expeditious disposition of this matter. 6 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), THE COURT SUMMARIZES THE SCHEDULING 7 ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 8 1. Initial disclosures shall be made within 28 days of the date of this order. 9 2. Plaintiff shall disclose experts no later than August 9, 2024. 10 3. Defendant shall disclose experts no later than August 23, 2024. 11 4. Rebuttal experts shall be disclosed no later than September 6, 2024. 12 5. Discovery shall be completed by October 4, 2024. 13 6. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by 14 November 22, 2024. 15 7. A Final Pretrial Conference date will be set after the resolution of any dispositive 16 motions, or passage of the dispositive motion cutoff. 17 8. The February 2, 2024, Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is vacated. 18 DATED: January 31, 2024 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19
20
21
22
23
24 DLB:6 DB/orders/orders.consent/barca1028.sched.ord 25
26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown