United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2024

(PS) Davis v. Jacques

(PS) Davis v. Jacques
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided February 5, 2024
(PS) Davis v. Jacques

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EARON DREVON DAVIS, Case No. 2:23-cv-01230-DAD-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS MICHAEL A. JACQUES, et al., AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THIS ORDER TO SHOW 15 Defendants. CAUSE AND AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 ECF No. 6 17 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS 20 On October 24, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it failed to state a claim. ECF No. 8. I granted him thirty days either to file an amended complaint or notify the court that he wishes to stand by his complaint, subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.1 Plaintiff is directed to file, within fourteen days, an amended complaint, and a response to the court’s order to show cause.

25 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 27 1 The day before I issued my order screening plaintiff’s complaint, he filed a motion to serve the complaint and summons on defendants. ECF No. 9. As the complaint does not state a claim, I will deny this motion at premature.

1 | litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, | for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; | Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. | King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a | district court has a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the | parties. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.

7 The court will give plaintiff an opportunity to explain why this case should not be | dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs failure to respond to this order will | constitute a failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this | action be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fourteen days why | this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.

12 | Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within fourteen days, an amended | complaint.

14 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 15 1. Plaintiff's motion to serve the complaint and summons, ECF No. 9, is denied.

16 2. Plaintiff shall file, within fourteen days, both an amended complaint and a response to | the court’s order to show cause.

18 3. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be || dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 ( q Sty - Dated: _ February 5, 2024 Q_-——— 23 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.