(PC) Dailey v. Solano County Sheriff

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHARON N. DAILEY, No. 2:23-cv-00788-TLN-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed January 17, 2024, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file an amended complaint. The extended deadline has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

1 | Dated: February 28, 2024 ( / we } ft | / } a ? CAROLYN DELANEY? SS 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12dai0788.fta 1]